June 30, 2025

Recovery of Rare-Earth Elements from Magnet Waste

Recovery of Rare-Earth Elements from Magnet Waste

The growing global demand for rare-earth elements (REEs), particularly neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), and dysprosium (Dy), is driven by their vital role in technologies such as electric vehicles, wind turbines, and electronics. As primary sources of REEs become increasingly depleted and environmentally taxing to mine, recycling REEs from end-of-life (EoL) NdFeB magnets presents a promising path toward sustainable resource management. However, the recycling rate of REEs remains low due to a combination of technological, economic, and infrastructural barriers. The development and optimization of diverse recovery methods hydrometallurgical, pyrometallurgical, and biometallurgical are critical to addressing these challenges.

Environmental Sustainability of Recovery Methods

REE recycling not only conserves natural resources but also minimizes the environmental footprint associated with mining. However, the sustainability of recycling processes depends on both their environmental impacts and economic viability.

Biometallurgical Methods (Bioleaching)

Bioleaching stands out as the most environmentally friendly approach, primarily due to its low carbon footprint and minimal generation of hazardous waste. Utilizing microorganisms to leach REEs from waste magnet material, bioleaching avoids the heavy use of chemicals and energy. However, its slow kinetics and lower extraction efficiencies limit large-scale application.

Hydrometallurgical Methods

Hydrometallurgy involves the use of aqueous chemistry, typically acids, to leach REEs from magnet waste. Recent innovations have improved its sustainability, particularly through closed-loop acid recycling systems. One such method uses oxalic acid to precipitate REEs, regenerating hydrochloric acid in the process, which is then reused. This significantly reduces fresh acid requirements and minimizes waste.

A comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) conducted by Becci et al. examined three recovery methods: hydrometallurgical using HCl, solid-state chlorination, and pyrometallurgical oxidation-carbothermic reduction. The hydrometallurgical method was found to be the most environmentally favorable, thanks to its lower energy consumption, simpler setup, and beneficial byproducts like Fe₂O₃, which contribute to environmental credits.

Pyrometallurgical Methods

Recent innovations in the field of metallurgy are focusing on reducing energy demands while improving efficiency. One such advancement is the use of selective chlorination, which employs ammonium chloride (NH₄Cl) at lower temperatures ranging from 300 to 420 °C. This method has demonstrated an impressive extraction efficiency of 99.8% for rare earth elements (REEs), all while minimizing energy consumption and chemical waste.

Another promising approach involves the utilization of waste tire rubber-derived carbon (WTR-DC) as a reducing agent. This strategy not only effectively isolates high-purity rare earth oxides (REOs) but also repurposes waste materials, thereby lowering carbon residue in the process.

Additionally, the short-loop calcium reduction diffusion technique offers a significant breakthrough by circumventing the traditional multi-step processes typically required. This method allows for the direct conversion of NdFeB magnet sludge into reusable magnetic powders. Operating at moderate temperatures, this innovation substantially decreases CO₂ emissions and energy consumption, facilitating on-site recycling directly at magnet manufacturing facilities..

Challenges in REE Recycling from Magnet Waste

Despite advancements in recycling techniques, the industry faces several persistent challenges. One significant issue is the material heterogeneity found in magnet waste streams. These streams are often compositionally diverse and can be contaminated with substances like oxygen, carbon, and other metals, complicating recovery processes' consistency and efficiency.

Additionally, the separation complexity of rare earth elements (REEs) presents a major hurdle. The similar chemical properties of these elements make selective separation quite difficult, and technologies capable of efficiently isolating individual elements such as dysprosium (Dy), neodymium (Nd), and praseodymium (Pr) are still under development.

Another critical challenge lies in maintaining the magnetic properties of recovered materials, particularly in short-loop recycling processes. Factors such as altered microstructure, grain size, and crystallographic texture can significantly affect performance. However, there is hope on the horizon, as the reapplication of grain boundary diffusion (GBD) processes using elements like terbium (Tb) has shown promise in restoring coercivity and thermal stability, which are essential for the effective use of recycled materials..

Toward a Circular REE Economy

A sustainable and circular economy for rare earth elements (REEs) must prioritize an advanced understanding of thermodynamics and kinetics. This entails gaining deeper insights into the high-temperature behaviors, solubility, and phase equilibria of REEs, which are crucial for optimizing selective extraction processes and minimizing waste generation.

In addition, there should be a focus on comprehensive economic and lifecycle analyses of various recovery methods. These evaluations need to take into account the costs of reagents, energy requirements, emissions produced, and the market value of the materials recovered.

Moreover, integrating green energy sources such as solar, wind, and hydro into energy-intensive pyrometallurgical operations can significantly decrease their environmental impact. By embracing these strategies, we can work towards a more sustainable future for the rare earth elements industry.

Conclusion

The recovery of rare-earth elements from magnet waste is a critical step in addressing global resource scarcity and advancing green technology. While no single method currently meets all economic and environmental criteria, a hybrid approach combining hydrometallurgy’s environmental advantages, pyrometallurgy’s efficiency, and biometallurgy’s ecological safety offers the best path forward. Continued research and innovation, supported by policy and infrastructure development, are vital to unlocking the full potential of REE recycling and achieving a sustainable future.

\